While it's not always strictly a win,
it's a win for files that see a noticeably compression ratio increase,
while it's a very small noise for other files.
Downside is, this patch is less efficient for 32-bit arrays of integer
than the previous patch which was introducing losses for other files,
but it's still a net improvement on this scenario.
helps when litlen==1 is cheaper than litlen==0
works great on pathological arr[u32] examples
but doesn't generalize well on other files.
silesia/x-ray is amoung the most negatively affected ones.
this works great for 32-bit arrays,
notably the synthetic ones, with extreme regularity,
unfortunately, it's not universal,
and in some cases, it's a loss.
Crucially, on average, it's a loss on silesia.
The most negatively impacted file is x-ray.
It deserves an investigation before suggesting it as an evolution.
This PR introduces no functional changes. It attempts to change all
macros currently using `{ }` or some variant of that to to
`do { } while (0)`, and introduces trailing `;` where necessary.
There were no bugs found during this migration.
The bug in Visual Studios warning on this has been fixed since VS2015.
Additionally, we have several instances of `do { } while (0)` which have
been present for several releases, so we don't have to worry about
breaking peoples builds.
Fixes Issue #3830.
* Remove all pointer-overflow suppressions from our UBSAN builds/tests.
* Add `ZSTD_ALLOW_POINTER_OVERFLOW_ATTR` macro to suppress
pointer-overflow at a per-function level. This is a superior approach
because it also applies to users who build zstd with UBSAN.
* Add `ZSTD_wrappedPtr{Diff,Add,Sub}()` that use these suppressions.
The end goal is to only tag these functions with
`ZSTD_ALLOW_POINTER_OVERFLOW`. But we can start by annoting functions
that rely on pointer overflow, and gradually transition to using
these.
* Add `ZSTD_maybeNullPtrAdd()` to simplify pointer addition when the
pointer may be `NULL`.
* Fix all the fuzzer issues that came up. I'm sure there will be a lot
more, but these are the ones that came up within a few minutes of
running the fuzzers, and while running GitHub CI.
- Adds memory type that is guaranteed to have been initialized at least once in the workspace's lifetime.
- Changes tag space in row hash to be based on init once memory.
fix#3328
In situations where the alphabet size is very small,
the evaluation of literal costs from the Optimal Parser is initially incorrect.
It takes some time to converge, during which compression is less efficient.
This is especially important for small files,
because there will not be enough data to converge,
so most of the parsing is selected based on incorrect metrics.
After this patch, the scenario ##3328 gets fixed,
delivering the expected 29 bytes compressed size (smallest known compressed size).
```
for f in $(find . \( -path ./.git -o -path ./tests/fuzz/corpora \) -prune -o -type f);
do
sed -i 's/Facebook, Inc\./Meta Platforms, Inc. and affiliates./' $f;
done
```
oss-fuzz uncovered a scenario where we're evaluating the cost of litLength = 131072,
which can't be represented in the zstd format, so we accessed 1 beyond LL_bits.
Fix the issue by making it cost 1 bit more than litLength = 131071.
There are still follow ups:
1. This happened because literals_cost[0] = 0, so the optimal parser chose 36 literals
over a match. Should we bound literals_cost[literal] > 0, unless the block truly only
has one literal value?
2. When no matches are found, the cost model isn't updated. In this case no matches were
found for an entire block. So the literals cost model wasn't updated at all. That made
the optimal parser think literals_cost[0] = 0, where it is actually quite high, since
the block was entirely random noise.
Credit to OSS-Fuzz.
the new contracts seems to make more sense :
updateRep() updates an array of repeat offsets _in place_,
while newRep() generates a new structure with the updated repeat-offset array.
Most callers are actually expecting the in-place variant,
and a limited sub-section, in `zstd_opt.c` mainly, prefer `newRep()`.
this meant to abstract the sumtype representation required
to transfert `offcode` to `ZSTD_storeSeq()`.
Unfortunately, the sumtype numeric representation is currently a leaky abstraction
that has permeated many other parts of the code,
especially within `zstd_lazy.c` and also within `zstd_opt.c` and `zstd_compress.c`.
While this PR makes a good job a transfering a large nb of call sites
to using the new macros, there are still a few sites where this transformation is more complex,
or where the numeric representation itself it used "as is".
One of the problematics area is the decision to use the numeric format of the sumtype
within the match finders of `zstd_lazy`.
This commit doesn't change the behavior, it only introduces and employes the macros,
but eventually the resulting code remains identical.
At target, if the numeric representation of the sumtype can be completely abstracted
and no other part of the code depends on it,
it will be possible to move it towards something slightly more efficient.
Use the same trick as we did for zstd_lazy in PR #2828:
* Create one search function specialization for each (dictMode, mls).
* Select the search function pointer at the top of the match finder.
Additionally, we no longer inline `ZSTD_compressBlock_opt_generic` into
every function, since `dictMode` is no longer used as a template. Create
two specializations, for opt levels 0 and 2, and call one of the two
specializations.
Lastly, remove the hack that disabled inlining for zstd_opt for the
Linux Kernel, as we've gotten most of the benefit already.
Compilation time sees a ~4x reduction:
| Compiler | Flags | Dev Time (s) | PR Time (s) | Delta |
|----------|----------------------------------|--------------|-------------|-------|
| gcc | -O3 | 10.1 | 2.3 | -77% |
| gcc | -O3 -fsanitize=address,undefined | 61.1 | 10.2 | -83% |
| clang | -O3 | 9.0 | 2.1 | -76% |
| clang | -O3 -fsanitize=address,undefined | 33.5 | 5.1 | -84% |
Build size is reduced by 150KB - 200KB:
| Compiler | Dev libzstd.a Size (B) | PR libzstd.a Size (B) | Delta |
|----------|------------------------|-----------------------|-------|
| gcc | 1327476 | 1177108 | -11% |
| clang | 1378324 | 1167780 | -15% |
There is a <2% speed loss in all cases:
| Compiler | Level | Dev Speed (MB/s) | PR Speed (MB/s) | Delta |
|----------|-------|------------------|-----------------|--------|
| gcc | 16 | 4.78 | 4.72 | -1.25% |
| gcc | 17 | 3.49 | 3.46 | -0.85% |
| gcc | 18 | 2.92 | 2.86 | -2.04% |
| gcc | 19 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 0.00% |
| clang | 16 | 4.69 | 4.80 | 2.34% |
| clang | 17 | 3.53 | 3.49 | -1.13% |
| clang | 18 | 2.86 | 2.85 | -0.34% |
| clang | 19 | 2.61 | 2.61 | 0.00% |
Fixes Issue #2862.
The optimal parser is unlikely to be used in the linux kernel in
practice. There is no reason these functions should be force inlined,
since we aren't gaining anything, and are losing build size.
| Compiler | Before (Bytes) | After (Bytes) | Delta (Bytes) |
|----------|----------------|---------------|---------------|
| gcc-11 | 1142090 | 952754 | -189336 |
| clang-12 | 1228402 | 976290 | -252112 |
This is a temporary solution pending the resolution of PR #2862 in the
`dev` branch.
Fix underflow of `nbCompares` by switching to an `int` and comparing
`nbCompares > 0`. This is a minimal fix, because I don't want to change
the logic. These loops seem to be doing `nbCompares + 1` comparisons.
The bug was reported by Dan Carpenter and found by Smatch static
checker.
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211008063704.GA5370@kili/
turns out, it's possible to constify MatchState* parameter
in some parts of the binary tree algorithm,
making it a pure read-only parameter,
as opposed to a mutable state.
This is supposed to be helpful for both maintenance and the compiler.
better for large files, and sources with relatively "stable" entropy,
like silesia.tar.
slightly worse for files with rapidly changing entropy,
like Calgary.tar/.
Updated small files tests in fuzzer
