mirror of
https://github.com/strongswan/strongswan.git
synced 2025-10-16 00:00:37 -04:00
ikev1: Make sure SPIs in an IKEv1 DELETE payload match the current SA
OpenBSD's isakmpd uses the latest ISAKMP SA to delete other expired SAs. This caused strongSwan to delete e.g. a rekeyed SA even though isakmpd meant to delete the old one. What isakmpd does might not be standard compliant. As RFC 2408 puts it: Deletion which is concerned with an ISAKMP SA will contain a Protocol-Id of ISAKMP and the SPIs are the initiator and responder cookies from the ISAKMP Header. This could either be interpreted as "copy the SPIs from the ISAKMP header of the current message to the DELETE payload" (which is what strongSwan assumed, and the direction IKEv2 took it, by not sending SPIs for IKE), or as clarification that ISAKMP "cookies" are actually the SPIs meant to be put in the payload (but that any ISAKMP SA may be deleted).
This commit is contained in:
parent
8a0cc3f362
commit
a7172ddaff
@ -1,4 +1,7 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copyright (C) 2015 Tobias Brunner
|
||||
* Hochschule fuer Technik Rapperswil
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Copyright (C) 2011 Martin Willi
|
||||
* Copyright (C) 2011 revosec AG
|
||||
*
|
||||
@ -74,6 +77,42 @@ METHOD(task_t, process_i, status_t,
|
||||
METHOD(task_t, process_r, status_t,
|
||||
private_isakmp_delete_t *this, message_t *message)
|
||||
{
|
||||
enumerator_t *payloads;
|
||||
payload_t *payload;
|
||||
delete_payload_t *delete_payload;
|
||||
ike_sa_id_t *id;
|
||||
u_int64_t spi_i, spi_r;
|
||||
bool found = FALSE;
|
||||
|
||||
/* some peers send DELETE payloads for other IKE_SAs, e.g. those for expired
|
||||
* ones after a rekeyeing, make sure the SPIs match */
|
||||
id = this->ike_sa->get_id(this->ike_sa);
|
||||
payloads = message->create_payload_enumerator(message);
|
||||
while (payloads->enumerate(payloads, &payload))
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (payload->get_type(payload) == PLV1_DELETE)
|
||||
{
|
||||
delete_payload = (delete_payload_t*)payload;
|
||||
if (!delete_payload->get_ike_spi(delete_payload, &spi_i, &spi_r))
|
||||
{
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (id->get_initiator_spi(id) == spi_i &&
|
||||
id->get_responder_spi(id) == spi_r)
|
||||
{
|
||||
found = TRUE;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
payloads->destroy(payloads);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!found)
|
||||
{
|
||||
DBG1(DBG_IKE, "received DELETE for different IKE_SA, ignored");
|
||||
return SUCCESS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
DBG1(DBG_IKE, "received DELETE for IKE_SA %s[%d]",
|
||||
this->ike_sa->get_name(this->ike_sa),
|
||||
this->ike_sa->get_unique_id(this->ike_sa));
|
||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user