Compare commits

..

No commits in common. "40ba750c4bf1f3f5f8dff5af57b2db4b600f237f" and "a89b399faa275c28d0ffe9759d492636f67d6da0" have entirely different histories.

6 changed files with 7 additions and 38 deletions

View File

@ -1036,9 +1036,6 @@ ROUTER = console
;;
;; Add co-authored-by and co-committed-by trailers if committer does not match author
;ADD_CO_COMMITTER_TRAILERS = true
;;
;; In addition to testing patches using the three-way merge method, re-test conflicting patches with git apply
;TEST_CONFLICTING_PATCHES_WITH_GIT_APPLY = false
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;

View File

@ -134,7 +134,6 @@ In addition there is _`StaticRootPath`_ which can be set as a built-in at build
- `DEFAULT_MERGE_MESSAGE_OFFICIAL_APPROVERS_ONLY`: **true**: In default merge messages only include approvers who are officially allowed to review.
- `POPULATE_SQUASH_COMMENT_WITH_COMMIT_MESSAGES`: **false**: In default squash-merge messages include the commit message of all commits comprising the pull request.
- `ADD_CO_COMMITTER_TRAILERS`: **true**: Add co-authored-by and co-committed-by trailers to merge commit messages if committer does not match author.
- `TEST_CONFLICTING_PATCHES_WITH_GIT_APPLY`: **false**: PR patches are tested using a three-way merge method to discover if there are conflicts. If this setting is set to **true**, conflicting patches will be retested using `git apply` - This was the previous behaviour in 1.18 (and earlier) but is somewhat inefficient. Please report if you find that this setting is required.
### Repository - Issue (`repository.issue`)

View File

@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ var (
DefaultMergeMessageOfficialApproversOnly bool
PopulateSquashCommentWithCommitMessages bool
AddCoCommitterTrailers bool
TestConflictingPatchesWithGitApply bool
} `ini:"repository.pull-request"`
// Issue Setting
@ -205,7 +204,6 @@ var (
DefaultMergeMessageOfficialApproversOnly bool
PopulateSquashCommentWithCommitMessages bool
AddCoCommitterTrailers bool
TestConflictingPatchesWithGitApply bool
}{
WorkInProgressPrefixes: []string{"WIP:", "[WIP]"},
// Same as GitHub. See

View File

@ -12,13 +12,8 @@ import (
// TimeStamp defines a timestamp
type TimeStamp int64
var (
// mock is NOT concurrency-safe!!
mock time.Time
// Used for IsZero, to check if timestamp is the zero time instant.
timeZeroUnix = time.Time{}.Unix()
)
// mock is NOT concurrency-safe!!
var mock time.Time
// Set sets the time to a mocked time.Time
func Set(now time.Time) {
@ -107,5 +102,5 @@ func (ts TimeStamp) FormatDate() string {
// IsZero is zero time
func (ts TimeStamp) IsZero() bool {
return int64(ts) == 0 || int64(ts) == timeZeroUnix
return int64(ts) == 0
}

View File

@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ import (
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/log"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/process"
repo_module "code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/repository"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/setting"
"code.gitea.io/gitea/modules/util"
"github.com/gobwas/glob"
@ -290,15 +289,13 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
// 2. AttemptThreeWayMerge first - this is much quicker than plain patch to base
description := fmt.Sprintf("PR[%d] %s/%s#%d", pr.ID, pr.BaseRepo.OwnerName, pr.BaseRepo.Name, pr.Index)
conflict, conflictFiles, err := AttemptThreeWayMerge(ctx,
conflict, _, err := AttemptThreeWayMerge(ctx,
tmpBasePath, gitRepo, pr.MergeBase, "base", "tracking", description)
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
if !conflict {
// No conflicts detected so we need to check if the patch is empty...
// a. Write the newly merged tree and check the new tree-hash
var treeHash string
treeHash, _, err = git.NewCommand(ctx, "write-tree").RunStdString(&git.RunOpts{Dir: tmpBasePath})
if err != nil {
@ -310,8 +307,6 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
if err != nil {
return false, err
}
// b. compare the new tree-hash with the base tree hash
if treeHash == baseTree.ID.String() {
log.Debug("PullRequest[%d]: Patch is empty - ignoring", pr.ID)
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusEmpty
@ -320,17 +315,9 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
return false, nil
}
// 3. OK the three-way merge method has detected conflicts
// 3a. Are still testing with GitApply? If not set the conflict status and move on
if !setting.Repository.PullRequest.TestConflictingPatchesWithGitApply {
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusConflict
pr.ConflictedFiles = conflictFiles
// 3. OK read-tree has failed so we need to try a different thing - this might actually succeed where the above fails due to whitespace handling.
log.Trace("Found %d files conflicted: %v", len(pr.ConflictedFiles), pr.ConflictedFiles)
return true, nil
}
// 3b. Create a plain patch from head to base
// 3a. Create a plain patch from head to base
tmpPatchFile, err := os.CreateTemp("", "patch")
if err != nil {
log.Error("Unable to create temporary patch file! Error: %v", err)
@ -353,7 +340,7 @@ func checkConflicts(ctx context.Context, pr *issues_model.PullRequest, gitRepo *
patchPath := tmpPatchFile.Name()
tmpPatchFile.Close()
// 3c. if the size of that patch is 0 - there can be no conflicts!
// 3b. if the size of that patch is 0 - there can be no conflicts!
if stat.Size() == 0 {
log.Debug("PullRequest[%d]: Patch is empty - ignoring", pr.ID)
pr.Status = issues_model.PullRequestStatusEmpty

View File

@ -32,7 +32,6 @@ export default {
},
data: () => ({
colorRange: [
'var(--color-secondary-alpha-70)',
'var(--color-secondary-alpha-70)',
'var(--color-primary-light-4)',
'var(--color-primary-light-2)',
@ -51,12 +50,6 @@ export default {
return s;
}
},
mounted() {
// work around issue with first legend color being rendered twice and legend cut off
const legend = document.querySelector('.vch__external-legend-wrapper');
legend.setAttribute('viewBox', '12 0 80 10');
legend.style.marginRight = '-12px';
},
methods: {
handleDayClick(e) {
// Reset filter if same date is clicked