Added Kurt's remarks

Johannes van der Kwast 2019-08-25 11:44:47 +02:00
parent 19fef144f2
commit e03106837c

@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ _We need a timing for this phase_
_We need to decide how to distribute the review between the reviewers, maybe set criteria for that such as conflict of interest, language, course themes, etc. Suggestion to add Lene Fischer and Erik Meerburg as advisors_ _We need to decide how to distribute the review between the reviewers, maybe set criteria for that such as conflict of interest, language, course themes, etc. Suggestion to add Lene Fischer and Erik Meerburg as advisors_
Notes from Kurt
_There is a feature I have requested that I believe would greatly help manage the applications. I would like to have space next to each for the date of contact and the status of the application (awaiting response | awaiting materials | in review). It becomes difficult to track who has been contacted, who has responded but is preparing their application etc. Many never respond or take a long time to respond. Many also need time (months) to update materials or prepare their application. With this feature it would be much easier to track and determine who needs initial contact or follow up.I requested something like this in October 2018 https://github.com/kartoza/prj.app/issues/980[https://github.com/kartoza/prj.app/issues/980](https://github.com/kartoza/prj.app/issues/980)_
## Registration of the organisation and courses ## Registration of the organisation and courses
Once the organisation is approved, the applicant will receive a confirmation email and the organisation can be managed in the Projecta platform. The Projecta platform is descibed in detail [here](http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/about/). Here we'll present the workflow. Once the organisation is approved, the applicant will receive a confirmation email and the organisation can be managed in the Projecta platform. The Projecta platform is descibed in detail [here](http://changelog.qgis.org/en/qgis/about/). Here we'll present the workflow.