remark on poll

QGISbugtracker.md

@@ -123,10 +123,14 @@ AGAINST:
     - (Vincent) : it is very different to support optional proprietary systems in our software, and have a mandatory closed platform for our project. I am in favor of pragmatic choices, but when choice is possible, then favor OpenSource. I do think we are in a situation where we have the choice here.
 
 - have to come up with a plan to handle 'tagging'/tagging system of issues to be able to search tickets? I started with some idea in 2015: https://github.com/rduivenvoorde/temp/issues
+  - (Vincent) This is true for GitHub and Gitlab alike. From my experience, labels system generally proves to be simple yet powerful enough to be able to set efficient rules for issue tagging and management.
 
 - have to come up with a plan to either export (some) tickets from redmine OR decide to start with a clean (3.0) sheet??
+  - (Vincent) This question is listed on the top of the page
 
 - (Tim) GitHub is already working well for us for many years with no issues, switching to a new infrastructure creates a lot of flux with no obvious benefit. Our time, money and resources are better spent on our code not on our infrastructure
 
 - (Tim) This is not simply moving our issue tracker - it involves moving our code too
     - (Vincent) Possibly, but not necessarily (hence put this remark here)
+
+- (Vincent) As for the poll, I personally think that the way the question was asked had a strong bias, as it did not consider any alternative, and was not clear on what would happen in case of a yes or no vote. It also seemed premature to ask at that time, when the discussion on the list was still ongoing with a lot of points still unknown and necessitating more study.