Rather than doing manual book keeping to plan the number of tests to run
in each TAP suite, conclude each run with done_testing() summing up the
the number of tests that ran. This removes the need for maintaning and
updating the plan count at the expense of an accurate count of remaining
during the test suite runtime.
This patch has been discussed a number of times, often in the context of
other patches which updates tests, so a larger number of discussions can
be found in the archives.
Reviewed-by: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dagfinn Ilmari Mannsåker <ilmari@ilmari.org>
Reviewed-by: Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Reviewed-by: Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota.ntt@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/DD399313-3D56-4666-8079-88949DAC870F@yesql.se
The five modules in our TAP test framework all had names in the top
level namespace. This is unwise because, even though we're not
exporting them to CPAN, the names can leak, for example if they are
exported by the RPM build process. We therefore move the modules to the
PostgreSQL::Test namespace. In the process PostgresNode is renamed to
Cluster, and TestLib is renamed to Utils. PostgresVersion becomes simply
PostgreSQL::Version, to avoid possible confusion about what it's the
version of.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/aede93a4-7d92-ef26-398f-5094944c2504@dunslane.net
Reviewed by Erik Rijkers and Michael Paquier
The tests added by c0280bc and d9ddc50 in 001_basic.pl have introduced
commands calling directly psql, making them sensitive to the
environment. One issue was that those commands forgot -X to not use a
local .psqlrc, causing all those tests to fail if psql cannot properly
parse this file.
TAP tests should be designed so as they run in an isolated fashion,
without any dependency on the environment where they are run. As
PostgresNode::psql gives already all the facilities those new tests
need, switch to that instead of calling plain psql commands where
interactions with a backend are needed. The test is slightly refactored
to be able to check after the expected patterns of stdout and stderr,
keeping the same amount of coverage as previously.
Reported-by: Peter Geoghegan
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAH2-Wzn8ftvcDPwomn+y04JJzbT=TG7TN=QsmSEATUOW-ZuvQQ@mail.gmail.com
