Fix typos in comments.

Oversight in commit fd5a1a0c3e56.

Author: Tender Wang <tndrwang@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAHewXNmTT3M_w4NngG=6G3mdT3iJ6DdncTqV9YnGXBPHW8XYtA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Masahiko Sawada 2025-08-16 01:11:40 -07:00
parent 37265ca01f
commit 928da6ff12
2 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ RelationFindDeletedTupleInfoSeq(Relation rel, TupleTableSlot *searchslot,
* IsIndexUsableForFindingDeletedTuple), a full table scan becomes
* necessary. In such cases, comparing the entire tuple is not required,
* since the remote tuple might not include all column values. Instead,
* the indexed columns alone are suffcient to identify the target tuple
* the indexed columns alone are sufficient to identify the target tuple
* (see logicalrep_rel_mark_updatable).
*/
indexbitmap = RelationGetIndexAttrBitmap(rel,

View File

@ -2923,7 +2923,7 @@ apply_handle_update_internal(ApplyExecutionData *edata,
/*
* Detecting whether the tuple was recently deleted or never existed
* is crucial to avoid misleading the user during confict handling.
* is crucial to avoid misleading the user during conflict handling.
*/
if (FindDeletedTupleInLocalRel(localrel, localindexoid, remoteslot,
&conflicttuple.xmin,
@ -3392,7 +3392,7 @@ apply_handle_tuple_routing(ApplyExecutionData *edata,
/*
* Detecting whether the tuple was recently deleted or
* never existed is crucial to avoid misleading the user
* during confict handling.
* during conflict handling.
*/
if (FindDeletedTupleInLocalRel(partrel,
part_entry->localindexoid,