sharpetronics/PostgreSQL
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-05-20 00:03:14 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Revert: looks like Binary Large OBject[sic] wasn't a misspelling

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2010-08-17 04:47:04 +00:00
parent 5194b9d049
commit 7b243aa666
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml
View File

@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.5 2010/08/17 04:37:20 petere Exp $ --> <!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/lo.sgml,v 1.6 2010/08/17 04:47:04 petere Exp $ -->
<sect1 id="lo"> <sect1 id="lo">
<title>lo</title> <title>lo</title>
@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
<para> <para>
One of the problems with the JDBC driver (and this affects the ODBC driver One of the problems with the JDBC driver (and this affects the ODBC driver
also), is that the specification assumes that references to BLOBs (Binary also), is that the specification assumes that references to BLOBs (Binary
Large Objects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the Large OBjects) are stored within a table, and if that entry is changed, the
associated BLOB is deleted from the database. associated BLOB is deleted from the database.
</para> </para>