sharpetronics/PostgreSQL
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-05-29 00:03:09 -04:00
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix LMGR for MVCC.

Browse Source 
Get rid of Extend lock mode.
This commit is contained in:
Vadim B. Mikheev 1999-05-07 01:23:11 +00:00
parent 86bc1da262
commit 122abf3af3
7 changed files with 207 additions and 219 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
src/backend/access/heap/hio.c
View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Id: hio.c,v 1.18 1999/05/01 15:04:46 vadim Exp $
* $Id: hio.c,v 1.19 1999/05/07 01:22:53 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -111,14 +111,13 @@ RelationPutHeapTupleAtEnd(Relation relation, HeapTuple tuple)
Item item;
/*
* Actually, we lock _relation_ here, not page, but I believe
* that locking page is faster... Obviously, we could get rid
* of ExtendLock mode at all and use ExclusiveLock mode on
* page 0, as long as we use page-level locking for indices only,
* but we are in 6.5-beta currently... - vadim 05/01/99
* Lock relation for extention. We can use LockPage here as long as
* in all other places we use page-level locking for indices only.
* Alternatevely, we could define pseudo-table as we do for
* transactions with XactLockTable.
*/
if (!relation->rd_myxactonly)
LockPage(relation, 0, ExtendLock);
LockPage(relation, 0, ExclusiveLock);
/*
* XXX This does an lseek - VERY expensive - but at the moment it is
@ -166,7 +165,7 @@ RelationPutHeapTupleAtEnd(Relation relation, HeapTuple tuple)
}
if (!relation->rd_myxactonly)
UnlockPage(relation, 0, ExtendLock);
UnlockPage(relation, 0, ExclusiveLock);
offnum = PageAddItem((Page) pageHeader, (Item) tuple->t_data,
tuple->t_len, InvalidOffsetNumber, LP_USED);

8
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lmgr.c
View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lmgr.c,v 1.22 1999/02/13 23:18:24 momjian Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lmgr.c,v 1.23 1999/05/07 01:23:02 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -79,9 +79,6 @@ static MASK LockConflicts[] = {
(1 << RowExclusiveLock) | (1 << RowShareLock) | (1 << AccessExclusiveLock) |
(1 << AccessShareLock),
/* ExtendLock */
(1 << ExtendLock)
};
static int LockPrios[] = {
@ -92,8 +89,7 @@ static int LockPrios[] = {
4,
5,
6,
7,
1
7
};
LOCKMETHOD LockTableId = (LOCKMETHOD) NULL;

251
src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c
View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c,v 1.49 1999/04/30 17:03:04 momjian Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c,v 1.50 1999/05/07 01:23:03 vadim Exp $
*
* NOTES
* Outside modules can create a lock table and acquire/release
@ -50,8 +50,7 @@
#include "utils/trace.h"
#include "utils/ps_status.h"
static int WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode,
TransactionId xid);
static int WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode);
/*
* lockDebugRelation can be used to trace unconditionally a single relation,
@ -143,12 +142,14 @@ static int WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode,
#endif /* !LOCK_MGR_DEBUG */
static char *lock_types[] = {
"",
"WRITE",
"READ",
"WRITE INTENT",
"READ INTENT",
"EXTEND"
"INVALID",
"AccessShareLock",
"RowShareLock",
"RowExclusiveLock",
"ShareLock",
"ShareRowExclusiveLock",
"ExclusiveLock",
"AccessExclusiveLock"
};
SPINLOCK LockMgrLock; /* in Shmem or created in
@ -631,12 +632,11 @@ LockAcquire(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
/* --------------------
* If I'm the only one holding a lock, then there
* cannot be a conflict. Need to subtract one from the
* lock's count since we just bumped the count up by 1
* above.
* cannot be a conflict. The same is true if we already
* hold this lock.
* --------------------
*/
if (result->nHolding == lock->nActive)
if (result->nHolding == lock->nActive || result->holders[lockmode] != 0)
{
result->holders[lockmode]++;
result->nHolding++;
@ -647,7 +647,39 @@ LockAcquire(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
return TRUE;
}
status = LockResolveConflicts(lockmethod, lock, lockmode, xid, result);
/*
* If lock requested conflicts with locks requested by waiters...
*/
if (lockMethodTable->ctl->conflictTab[lockmode] & lock->waitMask)
{
int i = 1;
/*
* If I don't hold locks or my locks don't conflict
* with waiters then force to sleep.
*/
if (result->nHolding > 0)
{
for ( ; i <= lockMethodTable->ctl->numLockModes; i++)
{
if (result->holders[i] > 0 &&
lockMethodTable->ctl->conflictTab[i] & lock->waitMask)
break; /* conflict */
}
}
if (result->nHolding == 0 || i > lockMethodTable->ctl->numLockModes)
{
XID_PRINT("LockAcquire: higher priority proc waiting",
result);
status = STATUS_FOUND;
}
else
status = LockResolveConflicts(lockmethod, lock, lockmode, xid, result);
}
else
status = LockResolveConflicts(lockmethod, lock, lockmode, xid, result);
if (status == STATUS_OK)
GrantLock(lock, lockmode);
else if (status == STATUS_FOUND)
@ -680,7 +712,25 @@ LockAcquire(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
return FALSE;
}
#endif
status = WaitOnLock(lockmethod, lock, lockmode, xid);
/*
* Construct bitmask of locks we hold before going to sleep.
*/
MyProc->holdLock = 0;
if (result->nHolding > 0)
{
int i,
tmpMask = 2;
for (i = 1; i <= lockMethodTable->ctl->numLockModes;
i++, tmpMask <<= 1)
{
if (result->holders[i] > 0)
MyProc->holdLock |= tmpMask;
}
Assert(MyProc->holdLock != 0);
}
status = WaitOnLock(lockmethod, lock, lockmode);
/*
* Check the xid entry status, in case something in the ipc
@ -712,10 +762,6 @@ LockAcquire(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
* determining whether or not any new lock acquired conflicts with
* the old ones.
*
* For example, if I am already holding a WRITE_INTENT lock,
* there will not be a conflict with my own READ_LOCK. If I
* don't consider the intent lock when checking for conflicts,
* I find no conflict.
* ----------------------------
*/
int
@ -812,32 +858,6 @@ LockResolveConflicts(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod,
}
Assert((result->nHolding >= 0) && (result->holders[lockmode] >= 0));
/*
* We can control runtime this option. Default is lockReadPriority=0
*/
if (!lockReadPriority)
{
/* ------------------------
* If someone with a greater priority is waiting for the lock,
* do not continue and share the lock, even if we can.
* Don't do this if the process already has some locks, because
* this could hold up other people waiting on our locks, causing
* a priority inversion. bjm
* ------------------------
*/
int myprio = LockMethodTable[lockmethod]->ctl->prio[lockmode];
PROC_QUEUE *waitQueue = &(lock->waitProcs);
PROC *topproc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(waitQueue->links.prev);
if (SHMQueueEmpty(&MyProc->lockQueue) && waitQueue->size &&
topproc->prio > myprio)
{
XID_PRINT("LockResolveConflicts: higher priority proc waiting",
result);
return STATUS_FOUND;
}
}
/* ----------------------------
* first check for global conflicts: If no locks conflict
* with mine, then I get the lock.
@ -909,12 +929,10 @@ GrantLock(LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode)
}
static int
WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode,
TransactionId xid)
WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode)
{
PROC_QUEUE *waitQueue = &(lock->waitProcs);
LOCKMETHODTABLE *lockMethodTable = LockMethodTable[lockmethod];
int prio = lockMethodTable->ctl->prio[lockmode];
char old_status[64],
new_status[64];
@ -934,11 +952,9 @@ WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode,
strcat(new_status, " waiting");
PS_SET_STATUS(new_status);
if (ProcSleep(waitQueue,
lockMethodTable->ctl->masterLock,
lockMethodTable->ctl,
lockmode,
prio,
lock,
xid) != NO_ERROR)
lock) != NO_ERROR)
{
/* -------------------
* This could have happend as a result of a deadlock,
@ -952,12 +968,16 @@ WaitOnLock(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock, LOCKMODE lockmode,
LOCK_PRINT_AUX("WaitOnLock: aborting on lock", lock, lockmode);
Assert((lock->nHolding >= 0) && (lock->holders[lockmode] >= 0));
Assert(lock->nActive <= lock->nHolding);
if (lock->activeHolders[lockmode] == lock->holders[lockmode])
lock->waitMask &= BITS_OFF[lockmode];
SpinRelease(lockMethodTable->ctl->masterLock);
elog(ERROR, "WaitOnLock: error on wakeup - Aborting this transaction");
/* not reached */
}
if (lock->activeHolders[lockmode] == lock->holders[lockmode])
lock->waitMask &= BITS_OFF[lockmode];
PS_SET_STATUS(old_status);
LOCK_PRINT_AUX("WaitOnLock: wakeup on lock", lock, lockmode);
return STATUS_OK;
@ -1129,6 +1149,7 @@ LockRelease(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
lock->nActive--;
lock->activeHolders[lockmode]--;
#ifdef NOT_USED
/* --------------------------
* If there are still active locks of the type I just released, no one
* should be woken up. Whoever is asleep will still conflict
@ -1138,6 +1159,19 @@ LockRelease(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
if (lock->activeHolders[lockmode])
wakeupNeeded = false;
else
#endif
/*
* Above is not valid any more (due to MVCC lock modes).
* Actually we should compare activeHolders[lockmode] with
* number of waiters holding lock of this type and try to
* wakeup only if these numbers are equal (and lock released
* conflicts with locks requested by waiters). For the moment
* we only check the last condition.
*/
if (lockMethodTable->ctl->conflictTab[lockmode] & lock->waitMask)
wakeupNeeded = true;
if (!(lock->activeHolders[lockmode]))
{
/* change the conflict mask. No more of this lock type. */
lock->mask &= BITS_OFF[lockmode];
@ -1199,12 +1233,6 @@ LockRelease(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
if (wakeupNeeded)
{
/* --------------------------
* Wake the first waiting process and grant him the lock if it
* doesn't conflict. The woken process must record the lock
* himself.
* --------------------------
*/
ProcLockWakeup(&(lock->waitProcs), lockmethod, lock);
}
else
@ -1275,6 +1303,7 @@ LockReleaseAll(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue)
for (;;)
{
bool wakeupNeeded = false;
/*
* Sometimes the queue appears to be messed up.
@ -1380,6 +1409,12 @@ LockReleaseAll(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue)
&&(lock->activeHolders[i] >= 0));
if (!lock->activeHolders[i])
lock->mask &= BITS_OFF[i];
/*
* Read comments in LockRelease
*/
if (!wakeupNeeded && xidLook->holders[i] > 0 &&
lockMethodTable->ctl->conflictTab[i] & lock->waitMask)
wakeupNeeded = true;
}
lock->nHolding -= xidLook->nHolding;
lock->nActive -= xidLook->nHolding;
@ -1444,14 +1479,8 @@ LockReleaseAll(LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue)
return FALSE;
}
}
else
else if (wakeupNeeded)
{
/* --------------------
* Wake the first waiting process and grant him the lock if it
* doesn't conflict. The woken process must record the lock
* him/herself.
* --------------------
*/
waitQueue = &(lock->waitProcs);
ProcLockWakeup(waitQueue, lockmethod, lock);
}
@ -1534,46 +1563,22 @@ LockingDisabled()
bool
DeadLockCheck(SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue, LOCK *findlock, bool skip_check)
{
int done;
XIDLookupEnt *xidLook = NULL;
XIDLookupEnt *tmp = NULL;
SHMEM_OFFSET end = MAKE_OFFSET(lockQueue);
LOCK *lock;
int done;
XIDLookupEnt *xidLook = NULL;
XIDLookupEnt *tmp = NULL;
SHMEM_OFFSET end = MAKE_OFFSET(lockQueue);
LOCK *lock;
LOCKMETHODTABLE *lockMethodTable;
XIDLookupEnt *result,
item;
HTAB *xidTable;
bool found;
static PROC *checked_procs[MAXBACKENDS];
static int nprocs;
static bool MyNHolding;
static PROC *checked_procs[MAXBACKENDS];
static int nprocs;
/* initialize at start of recursion */
if (skip_check)
{
checked_procs[0] = MyProc;
nprocs = 1;
lockMethodTable = LockMethodTable[DEFAULT_LOCKMETHOD];
xidTable = lockMethodTable->xidHash;
MemSet(&item, 0, XID_TAGSIZE);
TransactionIdStore(MyProc->xid, &item.tag.xid);
item.tag.lock = MAKE_OFFSET(findlock);
#ifdef NOT_USED
item.tag.pid = pid;
#endif
if (!(result = (XIDLookupEnt *)
hash_search(xidTable, (Pointer) &item, HASH_FIND, &found)) || !found)
{
elog(NOTICE, "LockAcquire: xid table corrupted");
return true;
}
MyNHolding = result->nHolding;
}
if (SHMQueueEmpty(lockQueue))
return false;
@ -1583,12 +1588,6 @@ DeadLockCheck(SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue, LOCK *findlock, bool skip_check)
for (;;)
{
/* ---------------------------
* XXX Here we assume the shared memory queue is circular and
* that we know its internal structure. Should have some sort of
* macros to allow one to walk it. mer 20 July 1991
* ---------------------------
*/
done = (xidLook->queue.next == end);
lock = (LOCK *) MAKE_PTR(xidLook->tag.lock);
@ -1613,45 +1612,21 @@ DeadLockCheck(SHM_QUEUE *lockQueue, LOCK *findlock, bool skip_check)
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(waitQueue->links.prev);
for (i = 0; i < waitQueue->size; i++)
{
/*
* If I hold some locks on findlock and another proc
* waits on it holding locks too - check if we are
* waiting one another.
*/
if (proc != MyProc &&
lock == findlock && /* skip_check also true */
MyNHolding) /* I already hold some lock on it */
lock == findlock && /* skip_check also true */
MyProc->holdLock)
{
/*
* For findlock's wait queue, we are interested in
* procs who are blocked waiting for a write-lock on
* the table we are waiting on, and already hold a
* lock on it. We first check to see if there is an
* escalation deadlock, where we hold a readlock and
* want a writelock, and someone else holds readlock
* on the same table, and wants a writelock.
*
* Basically, the test is, "Do we both hold some lock on
* findlock, and we are both waiting in the lock
* queue?" bjm
*/
LOCKMETHODCTL *lockctl =
LockMethodTable[DEFAULT_LOCKMETHOD]->ctl;
Assert(skip_check);
Assert(MyProc->prio >= 2);
lockMethodTable = LockMethodTable[1];
xidTable = lockMethodTable->xidHash;
MemSet(&item, 0, XID_TAGSIZE);
TransactionIdStore(proc->xid, &item.tag.xid);
item.tag.lock = MAKE_OFFSET(findlock);
#ifdef NOT_USED
item.tag.pid = pid;
#endif
if (!(result = (XIDLookupEnt *)
hash_search(xidTable, (Pointer) &item, HASH_FIND, &found)) || !found)
{
elog(NOTICE, "LockAcquire: xid table corrupted");
return true;
}
if (result->nHolding)
if (lockctl->conflictTab[MyProc->token] & proc->holdLock &&
lockctl->conflictTab[proc->token] & MyProc->holdLock)
return true;
}

132
src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c
View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.53 1999/04/30 02:04:51 momjian Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.54 1999/05/07 01:23:04 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
* This is so that we can support more backends. (system-wide semaphore
* sets run out pretty fast.) -ay 4/95
*
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.53 1999/04/30 02:04:51 momjian Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,v 1.54 1999/05/07 01:23:04 vadim Exp $
*/
#include <sys/time.h>
#include <unistd.h>
@ -106,6 +106,8 @@ static void ProcKill(int exitStatus, int pid);
static void ProcGetNewSemKeyAndNum(IPCKey *key, int *semNum);
static void ProcFreeSem(IpcSemaphoreKey semKey, int semNum);
static char *DeadLockMessage = "Deadlock detected -- See the lock(l) manual page for a possible cause.";
/*
* InitProcGlobal -
* initializes the global process table. We put it here so that
@ -488,68 +490,80 @@ ProcQueueInit(PROC_QUEUE *queue)
*/
int
ProcSleep(PROC_QUEUE *waitQueue,/* lock->waitProcs */
SPINLOCK spinlock,
LOCKMETHODCTL *lockctl,
int token, /* lockmode */
int prio,
LOCK *lock,
TransactionId xid) /* needed by user locks, see below */
LOCK *lock)
{
int i;
SPINLOCK spinlock = lockctl->masterLock;
PROC *proc;
int myMask = (1 << token);
int waitMask = lock->waitMask;
int aheadHolders[MAX_LOCKMODES];
bool selfConflict = (lockctl->conflictTab[token] & myMask),
prevSame = false;
bool deadlock_checked = false;
struct itimerval timeval,
dummy;
/*
* If the first entries in the waitQueue have a greater priority than
* we have, we must be a reader, and they must be a writers, and we
* must be here because the current holder is a writer or a reader but
* we don't share shared locks if a writer is waiting. We put
* ourselves after the writers. This way, we have a FIFO, but keep
* the readers together to give them decent priority, and no one
* starves. Because we group all readers together, a non-empty queue
* only has a few possible configurations:
*
* [readers] [writers] [readers][writers] [writers][readers]
* [writers][readers][writers]
*
* In a full queue, we would have a reader holding a lock, then a writer
* gets the lock, then a bunch of readers, made up of readers who
* could not share the first readlock because a writer was waiting,
* and new readers arriving while the writer had the lock. bjm
*/
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(waitQueue->links.prev);
/* If we are a reader, and they are writers, skip past them */
for (i = 0; i < waitQueue->size && proc->prio > prio; i++)
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(proc->links.prev);
/* The rest of the queue is FIFO, with readers first, writers last */
for (; i < waitQueue->size && proc->prio <= prio; i++)
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(proc->links.prev);
MyProc->prio = prio;
MyProc->token = token;
MyProc->waitLock = lock;
#ifdef USER_LOCKS
/* -------------------
* Currently, we only need this for the ProcWakeup routines.
* This must be 0 for user lock, so we can't just use the value
* from GetCurrentTransactionId().
* -------------------
*/
TransactionIdStore(xid, &MyProc->xid);
#else
#ifndef LowLevelLocking
/* -------------------
* currently, we only need this for the ProcWakeup routines
* -------------------
*/
TransactionIdStore((TransactionId) GetCurrentTransactionId(), &MyProc->xid);
#endif
#endif
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(waitQueue->links.prev);
/* if we don't conflict with any waiter - be first in queue */
if (!(lockctl->conflictTab[token] & waitMask))
goto ins;
for (i = 1; i < MAX_LOCKMODES; i++)
aheadHolders[i] = lock->activeHolders[i];
(aheadHolders[token])++;
for (i = 0; i < waitQueue->size; i++)
{
/* am I waiting for him ? */
if (lockctl->conflictTab[token] & proc->holdLock)
{
/* is he waiting for me ? */
if (lockctl->conflictTab[proc->token] & MyProc->holdLock)
{
MyProc->errType = STATUS_ERROR;
elog(NOTICE, DeadLockMessage);
goto rt;
}
/* being waiting for him - go past */
}
/* if he waits for me */
else if (lockctl->conflictTab[proc->token] & MyProc->holdLock)
{
break;
}
/* if conflicting locks requested */
else if (lockctl->conflictTab[proc->token] & myMask)
{
/*
* If I request non self-conflicting lock and there
* are others requesting the same lock just before me -
* stay here.
*/
if (!selfConflict && prevSame)
break;
}
/*
* Last attempt to don't move any more: if we don't conflict
* with rest waiters in queue.
*/
else if (!(lockctl->conflictTab[token] & waitMask))
break;
prevSame = (proc->token == token);
(aheadHolders[proc->token])++;
if (aheadHolders[proc->token] == lock->holders[proc->token])
waitMask &= ~ (1 << proc->token);
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(proc->links.prev);
}
ins:;
/* -------------------
* assume that these two operations are atomic (because
* of the spinlock).
@ -558,6 +572,7 @@ ProcSleep(PROC_QUEUE *waitQueue,/* lock->waitProcs */
SHMQueueInsertTL(&(proc->links), &(MyProc->links));
waitQueue->size++;
lock->waitMask |= myMask;
SpinRelease(spinlock);
/* --------------
@ -608,6 +623,8 @@ ProcSleep(PROC_QUEUE *waitQueue,/* lock->waitProcs */
*/
SpinAcquire(spinlock);
rt:;
#ifdef LOCK_MGR_DEBUG
/* Just to get meaningful debug messages from DumpLocks() */
MyProc->waitLock = (LOCK *) NULL;
@ -655,9 +672,9 @@ int
ProcLockWakeup(PROC_QUEUE *queue, LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock)
{
PROC *proc;
int count;
int count = 0;
int trace_flag;
int last_locktype = -1;
int last_locktype = 0;
int queue_size = queue->size;
Assert(queue->size >= 0);
@ -666,7 +683,6 @@ ProcLockWakeup(PROC_QUEUE *queue, LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock)
return STATUS_NOT_FOUND;
proc = (PROC *) MAKE_PTR(queue->links.prev);
count = 0;
while ((queue_size--) && (proc))
{
@ -678,7 +694,7 @@ ProcLockWakeup(PROC_QUEUE *queue, LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock)
continue;
/*
* This proc conflicts with locks held by others, ignored.
* Does this proc conflict with locks held by others ?
*/
if (LockResolveConflicts(lockmethod,
lock,
@ -686,6 +702,8 @@ ProcLockWakeup(PROC_QUEUE *queue, LOCKMETHOD lockmethod, LOCK *lock)
proc->xid,
(XIDLookupEnt *) NULL) != STATUS_OK)
{
if (count != 0)
break;
last_locktype = proc->token;
continue;
}
@ -828,7 +846,7 @@ HandleDeadLock(int sig)
*/
UnlockLockTable();
elog(NOTICE, "Deadlock detected -- See the lock(l) manual page for a possible cause.");
elog(NOTICE, DeadLockMessage);
return;
}

4
src/include/storage/lmgr.h
View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
*
* Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* $Id: lmgr.h,v 1.18 1999/02/19 06:06:34 tgl Exp $
* $Id: lmgr.h,v 1.19 1999/05/07 01:23:05 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -25,8 +25,6 @@
#define ExclusiveLock 6
#define AccessExclusiveLock 7
#define ExtendLock 8
extern LOCKMETHOD LockTableId;

5
src/include/storage/lock.h
View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
*
* Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* $Id: lock.h,v 1.24 1999/03/06 21:17:43 tgl Exp $
* $Id: lock.h,v 1.25 1999/05/07 01:23:07 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ typedef int LOCKMODE;
typedef int LOCKMETHOD;
/* MAX_LOCKMODES cannot be larger than the bits in MASK */
#define MAX_LOCKMODES 9
#define MAX_LOCKMODES 8
/*
* MAX_LOCK_METHODS corresponds to the number of spin locks allocated in
@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ typedef struct LOCK
/* data */
int mask;
int waitMask;
PROC_QUEUE waitProcs;
int holders[MAX_LOCKMODES];
int nHolding;

11
src/include/storage/proc.h
View File

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
*
* Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* $Id: proc.h,v 1.20 1999/02/19 07:10:47 tgl Exp $
* $Id: proc.h,v 1.21 1999/05/07 01:23:07 vadim Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -48,8 +48,9 @@ typedef struct proc
* were starting our xact: vacuum must not
* remove tuples deleted by xid >= xmin ! */
LOCK *waitLock; /* Lock we're sleeping on */
int token; /* info for proc wakeup routines */
LOCK *waitLock; /* Lock we're sleeping on ... */
int token; /* type of lock we sleeping for */
int holdLock; /* while holding these locks */
int pid; /* This procs process id */
short sLocks[MAX_SPINS]; /* Spin lock stats */
SHM_QUEUE lockQueue; /* locks associated with current
@ -116,8 +117,8 @@ extern bool ProcRemove(int pid);
/* make static in storage/lmgr/proc.c -- jolly */
extern void ProcQueueInit(PROC_QUEUE *queue);
extern int ProcSleep(PROC_QUEUE *queue, SPINLOCK spinlock, int token,
int prio, LOCK *lock, TransactionId xid);
extern int ProcSleep(PROC_QUEUE *queue, LOCKMETHODCTL *lockctl, int token,
LOCK *lock);
extern int ProcLockWakeup(PROC_QUEUE *queue, LOCKMETHOD lockmethod,
LOCK *lock);
extern void ProcAddLock(SHM_QUEUE *elem);